To give children iPads in school, or not – that is the question. The ‘correct’ answer to this question still remains a bit of a mystery. The use of iPads in the classroom has caused a political uproar in some school districts.
However, a researcher from Northwestern University may have a solution to the question of whether the classroom is a place for new technology. The solution: pairing children to share iPads.
In the study, the researcher examined a school district that was integrating a program to distribute iPads for each student in their kindergarten classrooms. This particular timing created a natural setting to study the effects of technology in the classroom.
The researcher compared kindergarten classrooms where each student had an iPad, students shared iPads in pairs, and students did not have access to iPads at all.
Over the course of one academic year, the researcher compared the classrooms, specifically students’ literacy skills, as measured by achievement testing.
The Surprising Results
Kindergartners who shared iPads with their classmates significantly outscored their peers on achievements tests compared to kindergarten classrooms with no iPads and classrooms with iPads for each student. Even after controlling for baseline scores and student demographics, the students in the classroom with shared iPads scored 30 points higher on the achievement test.
The researcher asserts that the collaborative element around the technology — not just the collaboration itself — led to students’ increased scores on the achievement tests.
Furthermore, these findings support how technology, like an iPad, can be used in early education to help promote learning and collaborative efforts. With technology, students will not only be exposed to new ways of problem-solving and thinking, but working in pairs may prompt the children to help one another learn. Children may also learn how to problem-solve together and get along with their fellow classmates.
Shared iPads in the classroom is a reasonable compromise for both administrators, teachers, and students. It would be more cost effective and, according to this research, would have the best outcomes for the students.
At NeuroNet we know that many educators are concerned about their school budgets and how to best integrate technology. With our Classroom Enrichment Program, teachers use iPad assessments and reports to measure fluency and track progress. NeuroNet does not require one-to-one technology, classrooms only need a SmartBoard and one iPad. Not only is it more cost effective, but the shared learning is more fun!
Watch NeuroNet students at the Westminster School
P.S. If you liked this post, why not get our Learning in Motion email?
Awesome, research-based ideas for learning enrichment. Get on the list.